From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pacheco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

13813.

Decided and Entered: June 17, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered May 9, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Paul L. Gruner, Public Defender, Kingston (Mari Ann Connolly Sennett of counsel), for appellant.

Donald A. Williams, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In March 2001, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in full satisfaction of an eight-count indictment. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to 7½ years in prison, but was not advised prior to entering his plea that he would also be subject to a period of postrelease supervision at the conclusion of his incarceration. He now appeals.

The failure to advise defendant — prior to accepting his plea — that the agreed-upon prison sentence would be followed by a mandatory period of postrelease supervision pursuant to Penal Law § 70.45 requires that he be provided the opportunity to withdraw his plea under our decision inPeople v. Goss ( 286 A.D.2d 180). This remedy is appropriate — despite defendant's failure to make an appropriate motion before County Court — since the plea proceeding took place before our decision in that case and the decision was rendered during the pendency of defendant's appeal (see People v. Grose, 2 A.D.3d 1211; People v. Hazen, 308 A.D.2d 637, 638; People v. Vahedi, 305 A.D.2d 866, 866; People v. Jaworski, 296 A.D.2d 597, 598).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, plea vacated and matter remitted to the County Court of Ulster County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.


Summaries of

People v. Pacheco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR PACHECO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 327

Citing Cases

State v. Salaam

By not moving to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve…

People v. Collier

Moreover, while County Court should have advised defendant at the time of the plea that the sentence would…