From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 19, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, by pleading guilty, forfeited appellate review of any claim that his right to testify before the Grand Jury had been violated (see, People v. Lasher, 199 A.D.2d 595; People v Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305; People v. Torra, 191 A.D.2d 738; People v Ferrara, 99 A.D.2d 257).

Further, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926; People v. Lisbon, 187 A.D.2d 457; People v. Richardson, 214 A.D.2d 624).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v. James, 192 A.D.2d 555), or involve matters dehors the record (see, People v. Grazzette, 211 A.D.2d 822; People v Perez, 208 A.D.2d 960; People v. Dyson, 200 A.D.2d 756). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HECTOR ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

People v. Singleton

Finally, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying the defendant's motion to…

PEOPLE v. LYDE

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his…