From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-30

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony M. ORTIZ, appellant.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Adam B. Levy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (Heather M. Abissi of counsel), for respondent.


Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Adam B. Levy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (Heather M. Abissi of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Rooney, J.), entered June 12, 2013, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5;People v. Pryor, 11 A.D.3d 565, 782 N.Y.S.2d 803). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646;People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5;People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). The defendant's postplea assertion regarding the defense of insanity did not warrant vacatur of his plea of guilty ( see People v. Bunn, 79 A.D.3d 1143, 914 N.Y.S.2d 907).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation ( see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584;People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Sanders, 112 A.D.3d 748, 976 N.Y.S.2d 205). MASTRO, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony M. ORTIZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 1070
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2958

Citing Cases

People v. Fontanet

The defendant's contention that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent survives his valid…

People v. Fontanet

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's oral colloquy sufficiently advised the defendant…