Summary
upholding a conviction for heroin although the charge was cocaine
Summary of this case from United States v. Martinez-LopezOpinion
B160760.
7-30-2003
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD OROZCO, Defendant and Appellant.
Richard Orozco appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of unlawful driving or taking a motor vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)) and evading an officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.1, subd. (a)). Appellant admitted five prior convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5. He was sentenced to state prison for a term of eight years. We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an "Opening Brief" in which no issues were raised. On January 22, 2003, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071.)
The judgment is affirmed.