From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Orlando

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2012
98 A.D.3d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-22

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mark ORLANDO, appellant.

Mark Orlando, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Sarah S. Rabinowitz and Robert A. Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.


Mark Orlando, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Sarah S. Rabinowitz and Robert A. Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 28, 2009 ( People v. Orlando, 61 A.D.3d 1001, 878 N.Y.S.2d 185), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered August 18, 2005.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987;People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, ANGIOLILLO and BALKIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Orlando

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2012
98 A.D.3d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Orlando

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mark ORLANDO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6036
950 N.Y.S.2d 280

Citing Cases

Orlando v. Nassau Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

Following his unsuccessful state appeals, Orlando filed two unsuccessful coram nobis petitions in state court…