From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Orlando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2011
85 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2005-08854.

June 7, 2011.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 28, 2009 ( People v Orlando, 61 AD3d 1001), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered August 18, 2005.

Mark Orlando, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Sarah S. Rabinowitz and Robert A. Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Orlando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2011
85 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Orlando

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK ORLANDO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5100
925 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Orlando v. Schneiderman

Petitioner did not file a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Petition at ¶ 18. Petitioner…

Orlando v. Schneiderman

Petitioner did not file a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Petition at ¶ 18. Petitioner…