From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Donnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 9, 1985
113 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

September 9, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Resentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing in the light of People v Farrar ( 52 N.Y.2d 302).

It is clear that the sentencing Judge did not exercise his discretion in resentencing the defendant but, rather, conformed to the terms set forth by the District Attorney as a condition for consenting to the acceptance of the plea. Thus, judicial discretion was never exercised ( see, People v Farrar, supra).

We further find that this is not a case where the District Attorney has the right to make application to withdraw his consent to the plea. Such consent was not a necessary condition to the acceptance of the plea under the applicable statute ( see, CPL 200.15, 220.10 Crim. Proc.). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. O'Donnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 9, 1985
113 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. O'Donnell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS E. O'DONNELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 9, 1985

Citations

113 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Irizarry

County Court did not do so and, indeed, made clear that it would not grant youthful offender treatment solely…

People v. Irizarry

County Court did not do so and, indeed, made clear that it would not grant youthful offender treatment solely…