From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Connor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2014-08598 Ind. No. 12-01190.

02-17-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael O'CONNOR, appellant.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se. James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Virginia A. Marciano, Jennifer Spencer, and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.


Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Virginia A. Marciano, Jennifer Spencer, and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered August 26, 2014, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, is without merit.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his contentions regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct and the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury (see People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773; People v. Woods, 115 A.D.3d 997, 998, 982 N.Y.S.2d 180; People v. Devodier, 102 A.D.3d 884, 885, 958 N.Y.S.2d 220; People v. Ortiz, 84 A.D.3d 839, 840, 922 N.Y.S.2d 192).

The defendant contends that a final order of protection issued at sentencing is invalid because the County Court failed to articulate on the record its reasons for issuing the order as required by CPL 530.13(4). This contention is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant did not raise this issue at sentencing or move to amend the final order of protection on this ground (see People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 316–318, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13; People v. Fortier, 130 A.D.3d 642, 12 N.Y.S.3d 283; People v. Sweeney, 106 A.D.3d 841, 842, 966 N.Y.S.2d 120; People v. Reynolds, 85 A.D.3d 825, 925 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Decker, 77 A.D.3d 675, 908 N.Y.S.2d 361).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. O'Connor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael O'CONNOR, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1202
24 N.Y.S.3d 918

Citing Cases

People v. Samuels

Neither at the plea proceedings, when the prosecutor announced his request for an order of protection, nor at…

People v. White

iew, since the defendant did not move to vacate his plea or otherwise raise this issue in the sentencing…