From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Notrica

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 29, 1972
69 Misc. 2d 591 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)

Opinion

February 29, 1972

Appeal from the Suffolk County District Court, ROCKWELL D. COLANERI, J.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney ( Ronald E. Lipetz of counsel), for appellant.

Sarisohn, Thierman Sarisohn ( Walter G. Steindler of counsel), for respondent.


Order unanimously reversed on the law and motion to suppress evidence remanded for determination de novo after a new hearing.

In our opinion, the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inapplicable (see United States v. Wallace Co., 336 U.S. 793; United States v. Williams, 227 F.2d 149). The interests of justice will be served by ordering a new hearing on the original motion to suppress.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., GLICKMAN and McCULLOUGH, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Notrica

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 29, 1972
69 Misc. 2d 591 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)
Case details for

People v. Notrica

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MARC NOTRICA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Feb 29, 1972

Citations

69 Misc. 2d 591 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)
330 N.Y.S.2d 751

Citing Cases

State v. Gonzalez

The only other decisions involving similar instances of inconsistent suppression orders have refused to allow…

People v. Rasero

The ultimate issue of Rasero's perjury has not been previously litigated. Accordingly there is neither an…