From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nicot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1997
237 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 3, 1997.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered June 27, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, closure of the courtroom was proper here. The undercover officer testified that he feared for his safety, would be returning to the area of the defendant's arrest, and had lost subjects in that area. Additionally, the undercover officer entered the courthouse through a private entrance and remained hidden in a private room prior to testifying ( see, People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436; People v Kin Kan, 78 NY2d 54).

The defendant's remaining contentions lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Nicot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1997
237 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Nicot

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY NICOT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 376

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in closing the courtroom during the testimony of…

People v. Vilsaint

When the undercover officer entered the courtroom, he alerted the prosecutor that he recognized one of the…