From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nentarz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

January, 1932.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ. [ 142 Misc. 477.]


Appeal dismissed.


The order denying the motion to change the place of trial, in our opinion, is not appealable. ( People v. Brindell, 194 App. Div. 776.) But even if it were appealable, the order should stand, for the papers fall far short of showing that a fair and impartial trial of the defendant upon the indictment cannot be had in Monroe county. What the affidavits do show, however, if believed, is an outrageous abuse of the defendant's rights which, if true, would merit the severest condemnation. All concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nentarz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

People v. Nentarz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK NENTARZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)