From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1984
104 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

October 26, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Dwyer, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We note that the issue raised by the defendant concerning his plea of guilty was not presented to the court of first instance by way of a motion to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment. Accordingly, that issue has not been preserved for review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Willie, 101 A.D.2d 819; People v Thomas, 74 A.D.2d 317, aff'd 53 N.Y.2d 338). In any event, were we to address the merits, we would affirm.

Regarding defendant's sentence, which he claims is excessive, he pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. On this record, defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive. Brown, J.P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1984
104 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEMETRIUS NELSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. White

Sentence affirmed. Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the sentence imposed was not excessive,…

People v. Wages

The plea was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered ( see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).…