From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to charge manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of depraved indifference murder. We find, however, that there was no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see, CPL 300.50; People v. Gomez, 65 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Roe, 74 N.Y.2d 20; People v. Zebrowski, 198 A.D.2d 716; People v. Ochoa, 142 A.D.2d 741).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN MURRAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 230

Citing Cases

People v. Vargas

We find, however, that there was no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the…

People v. Tinch

There was no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed the…