From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Munoz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1976
54 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 10, 1976


Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered October 24, 1975, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment from one year to life, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the indictment is dismissed. If the defendant is still incarcerated, he shall be discharged forthwith. In our view there is a reasonable doubt as a matter of law (cf. People v Ledwon, 153 N.Y. 10, 17) whether defendant was acting as agent for the buyer and thus was not guilty of the crime. We think it was particularly unfair for the police to use the defendant's supervisor in a methadone maintenance program as a confidential informant, under a promise that the confidential informant's client, the defendant, would not be prosecuted, and for the defendant then to be prosecuted for obtaining narcotics at the request of his supervisor and the police.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Munoz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1976
54 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARDO MUNOZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. McLeod

There is a reasonable doubt as a matter of law. (People v Ledwon, 153 N.Y. 10.) As to the charge of…

People v. Lam Lek Chong

ciple, the statutory definition of "sell" has been revised as part of the over-all revision of the Penal Law…