From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mungo

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 29, 2010
488 Mich. 920 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 141160.

October 29, 2010.

Reported below: 288 Mich App 167.


Leave to Appeal Granted.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010, judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is granted, limited to the issue whether, assuming that Arizona v Gant, 556 US ___; 129 S Ct 1710 (2009), is applied retroactively, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule allows admission of evidence that was seized pursuant to a warrantless search that was valid under cases interpreting New York, v Belton, 453 US 454 (1981), as a bright-line rule. See Herring v United States, 555 US 135 (2009).

We further order the Washtenaw Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint the State Appellate Defender Office to represent the defendant in this Court.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


I concur with the Court's order granting leave to appeal and would also request the parties to brief the authority for the arresting officer's request to the passenger for a driver's license and identification.

KELLY, C.J., joined the statement of CAVANAGH, J.


Summaries of

People v. Mungo

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 29, 2010
488 Mich. 920 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Mungo

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. MUNGO

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 29, 2010

Citations

488 Mich. 920 (Mich. 2010)

Citing Cases

People v. Mungo

SC: 141160, COA: 269250, Washtenaw CC: 05-001221 On order of the Court, leave to appeal was granted, 488 Mich…

People v. Mungo

The Michigan Supreme Court granted the prosecution'sapplication for leave to appeal our ruling in Mungo II.…