From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morse

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 19, 2008
480 Mich. 1074 (Mich. 2008)

Summary

In Morse, our Supreme Court remanded a case back to the trial court in order to remove a $300 fine from the judgment of sentence because the "fine was clearly not a part of the sentencing agreement, and the defendant was not offered the opportunity to withdraw his plea after the fine was imposed as part of the sentence."

Summary of this case from People v. Naseman

Opinion

No. 135413.

February 19, 2008.

Court of Appeals No. 280205.


Summary Dispositions February 19, 2008.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Montcalm Circuit Court for the trial court to correct the judgment of sentence by deleting the $300 fine. The fine was clearly not a part of the sentencing agreement, and the defendant was not offered the opportunity to withdraw his plea after the fine was imposed as part of the sentence. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Morse

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 19, 2008
480 Mich. 1074 (Mich. 2008)

In Morse, our Supreme Court remanded a case back to the trial court in order to remove a $300 fine from the judgment of sentence because the "fine was clearly not a part of the sentencing agreement, and the defendant was not offered the opportunity to withdraw his plea after the fine was imposed as part of the sentence."

Summary of this case from People v. Naseman
Case details for

People v. Morse

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALAN LEE MORSE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

480 Mich. 1074 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

People v. Naseman

-------- Defendant bases his argument that the trial court did not abide by his Cobbs agreement on People v…

People v. Foster

Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the judgment of sentence in LC No. 14-008692-FH that requires…