From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Molina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 20, 2020
180 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11086 Ind. 3211N/16

02-20-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan MOLINA, Defendant–Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ronald Alfano of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ronald Alfano of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Molina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 20, 2020
180 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Molina

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Molina…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 20, 2020

Citations

180 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1261
116 N.Y.S.3d 569

Citing Cases

Treacy v. Ferder

The complaint's potential to survive a summary judgment motion or to be established at trial is irrelevant to…

Waterbury v. N.Y.C. Ballet, Inc.

Under CPLR 3211(a)(7), "the pleading is to be afforded a liberal construction, the facts as alleged in the…