Opinion
May 22, 1986
Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Monroe, J.).
Defendant was found guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree as a result of his possession of a sharpened metal "shank" on November 23, 1983 while an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility. Before trial commenced, defendant objected to County Court's ruling that defendant would be handcuffed and shackled throughout the trial. Defendant raises several issues on this appeal; however, we need direct our attention to but one which is dispositive of the matter.
While the record reveals that the defendant excepted to County Court's ruling ordering that he be tried in restraints, the record contains no statement by the court giving any reasons for the order. In addition, the court failed to instruct the jury with regard to its consideration of the restraints. Defendant contends that this constituted a denial of his right to a fair trial. We concur (see, People v Hart, 112 A.D.2d 471). Contrary to the argument advanced by the People, defendant's failure to request such a charge is not fatal. Further, we do not find persuasive the People's argument that the error was not prejudicial to defendant. The use of restraints should be avoided whenever possible and, in any event, the reason for their use should be articulated on the record with appropriate instructions given to the jury.
Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Chemung County for a new trial. Main, J.P., Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.