From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mitchell, Acquista, Norman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1946
70 N.E.2d 168 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1946

Decided October 18, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, McDONALD, P.J., PAIGE, NORTHROP, JJ.

Stanley A. Katcher for Jay Mitchell and Jessica Norman, appellants.

Morris L. Ernst, Alexander Lindey and Theodora S. Zavin for The Society of Magazine Photographers, amicus curiae. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Whitman Knapp and David Du Vivier of counsel), for respondent.


Judgments reversed and informations dismissed upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish the guilt of any of the defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. No opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, CONWAY, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., and DESMOND, J., concur as to the defendants Acquista and Norman, but dissent and vote to affirm the judgment as to the defendant Mitchell.


Summaries of

People v. Mitchell, Acquista, Norman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1946
70 N.E.2d 168 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

People v. Mitchell, Acquista, Norman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAY MITCHELL, MARGARET…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 18, 1946

Citations

70 N.E.2d 168 (N.Y. 1946)
70 N.E.2d 168

Citing Cases

Matter of Trans-Lux Distr. v. Bd. of Regents

This observation is equally pertinent, of course, whether the sexual exhibitionism is done spontaneously in…