From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Miller

Supreme Court of California
Dec 18, 1889
82 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1889)

Summary

In People v. Miller, 82 Cal. 107 [22 P. 934], a man and wife were charged with criminal conspiracy and convicted by the jury.

Summary of this case from People v. MacMullen

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County.

         COUNSEL:

         W. H. C. Ecker, N.H. Dodson, and Wellington Stewart, for Appellant.

          Attorney-General Johnson, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Sharpstein, J. Works, J., and McFarland, J., concurred. Beatty, C. J. Fox, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          SHARPSTEIN; BEATTY, Judge

         Appellant and his wife were tried and convicted of criminal conspiracy. The information upon which they were tried states that "H. Miller and Minnie Miller, being then and there husband and wife, are accused by the district attorney of the said county [San Diego] by this information of the crime of criminal conspiracy."

         The minutes of the court show that [22 P. 935] after the defendants had been found guilty by the verdict of a jury, and their motion for a new trial denied, they appeared for sentence, when the following proceedings were had. We copy from the minutes: "The court at this time sentences Minnie Miller to a fine of one dollar, which the court will pay. The court at this time sentences H. Miller to be imprisoned in the county jail of San Diego county for a term of one year."

         Defendant H. Miller appeals. His sole contention here is, that the information does not accuse him of any offense, because a man and his wife, being in law but one person, no prosecution for a conspiracy can be maintained against them.

         That such was the rule of the common law, we cannot doubt, and we find nothing in the code or statutes of this state to indicate an intention of the legislature to change it.

         The defendants could only be tried upon an indictment or information which accused them of a criminal offense; a trial upon an information which does not accuse them of a criminal offense was wholly unauthorized, and the judgment must be reversed.

         Judgment reversed, with directions to the court below to discharge appellant from imprisonment.

         Beatty, C. J. The foregoing judgment and decision is hereby approved, and remittitur ordered to issue forthwith.


Summaries of

People v. Miller

Supreme Court of California
Dec 18, 1889
82 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1889)

In People v. Miller, 82 Cal. 107 [22 P. 934], a man and wife were charged with criminal conspiracy and convicted by the jury.

Summary of this case from People v. MacMullen
Case details for

People v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. MILLER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 18, 1889

Citations

82 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1889)
22 P. 934

Citing Cases

People v. MacMullen

It is further said in this case, citing from Wharton's Criminal Pleading and Practice, "In an indictment for…

People v. Pierce

Counts 2 and 3 charged defendants with violations of Corporations Code section 26104, subdivision (a), and…