From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Meticheccia

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 5, 1977
91 Misc. 2d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)

Opinion

April 5, 1977

Appeal from the City Court of Mount Vernon, Westchester County, IRVING B. KENDALL, J.

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Stephen C. Unsino and Carl F. Lodes of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph S. Ragno for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Order is unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress denied and matter remanded for trial.

Since a pen register does not "intercept communication", its use does not require prior judicial approval (United States v Auler, 539 F.2d 642; United States v Clegg, 509 F.2d 605; United States v Baxter, 492 F.2d 150; Korman v United States, 486 F.2d 926; People v Stewart, 73 Misc.2d 399).

Concur: FARLEY, P.J., PITTONI and SILBERMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Meticheccia

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 5, 1977
91 Misc. 2d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)
Case details for

People v. Meticheccia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ANTHONY J. METICHECCIA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1977

Citations

91 Misc. 2d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)
397 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

United States v. Aiello

The pen register, which itself did not record conversations but only the time when the Salemi phone was taken…

State v. Brown

Thus, the courts have held that only the caller, the person called and those with a possessory interest in…