From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Messenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-02919.

Decided May 10, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered March 4, 2003, convicting her of assault in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Daniel M. Reback of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly determined, after a hearing, that she violated certain conditions of her plea agreement ( see generally People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, cert denied sub nom Maietta v. Artuz, 519 U.S. 964).

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not effectively waive her right to appeal her sentence ( see People v. Boustani, 300 A.D.2d 313; People v. Dongo, 244 A.D.2d 353). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Fields, 197 A.D.2d 633; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Messenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Messenger

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. HEIDI MESSENGER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

People v. Ouanounou

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly determined, after a hearing, that there…

People v. Knowlden

Ordered that the amended sentence imposed October 19, 2005 is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's…