Opinion
March 12, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Alvin Schlesinger, J., Edward Sheridan, J.
The scope of cross-examination rests in the trial court's discretion, which is reviewed on appeal only for plain abuse ( People v Trinidad, 177 A.D.2d 286, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 865). A review of the record fails to demonstrate an abuse of such discretion in the trial court's rulings precluding defendant's cross-examination of the complainant about whether she made false criminal allegations against two other men and whether she traded sex for cocaine prior to the subject incident. Defendant failed to proffer a sufficient good faith basis to require the court to permit inquiry into either of these collateral matters. It should be noted that, on the oral argument, defense counsel conceded that the questions were for impeachment of the complainant's general credibility only.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.