From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McLeod

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 15, 1978
379 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1978

Decided June 15, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MAX BLOOM, J.

Herbert S. Siegal for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Leonard G. Kamlet and Billie Manning of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed on the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 58 A.D.2d 747).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE. Judges JASEN and GABRIELLI concur in result only in the following concurring memorandum.


We concur in result only because we reject the agency defense, as is articulated and explained in the dissenting opinion by Judge GABRIELLI in People v Roche ( 45 N.Y.2d 78, decided herewith).

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. McLeod

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 15, 1978
379 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

People v. McLeod

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LLOYD GEORGE McLEOD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 15, 1978

Citations

379 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1978)
379 N.E.2d 218
407 N.Y.S.2d 693

Citing Cases

People v. Simpson

There must be some evidence that the defendant acted as a mere instrumentality of the buyer in order to…

People v. Tucker

The conflicting testimony adduced at trial presented a question of fact as to whether defendant acted merely…