From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1990
166 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

finding that threatening to shoot a child with a loaded shotgun if police attempted to enter an apartment, where there was no indication that the police were going to enter the apartment, was insufficient to support a conviction under New York Penal Law § 120.20

Summary of this case from Osborne v. Cnty. of Seneca

Opinion

October 5, 1990

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.


Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The People failed to prove the elements of reckless endangerment in the first degree. "A person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person" (Penal Law § 120.25). The proof shows that defendant, armed with a loaded shotgun, held his child hostage in an upstairs bedroom and threatened to shoot the child and himself if the police came upstairs to apprehend him. The mere threat to use a gun is insufficient to support a conviction for reckless endangerment (People v. Davis, 72 N.Y.2d 32, 36-37). The acts of defendant must, in fact, put the life of the victim in danger (see, People v. Grossman, 124 A.D.2d 974, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 746; see also, People v. Davis, supra). Here, there is no proof that the conduct of defendant did, in fact, create a grave risk of death to the child. There was no likelihood that the police would attempt to ascend the stairs to apprehend defendant. The record is replete with testimony that the police determined not to place the life of the child in jeopardy by attempting to apprehend defendant.

For the same reasons, defendant's conduct did not create "a substantial risk of serious physical injury" to the child and, thus, we may not reduce the conviction to reckless endangerment in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.20).

The judgment is modified, therefore, by reversing the conviction for reckless endangerment in the first degree and by vacating the sentence imposed thereon.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1990
166 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

finding that threatening to shoot a child with a loaded shotgun if police attempted to enter an apartment, where there was no indication that the police were going to enter the apartment, was insufficient to support a conviction under New York Penal Law § 120.20

Summary of this case from Osborne v. Cnty. of Seneca
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

Osborne v. Cnty. of Seneca

olice van provided probable cause to arrest for Reckless Endangerment in Second Degree); People v.…

Campbell v. Greene

See N.Y. Penal Law § 120.25; People v. Martinez, 166 A.D.2d 882 (4th Dept. 1990);see also Trial Tr. at…