From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1993
191 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 18, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Jackson, J.).


The defendant was sentenced to the statutory minimum by the sentencing court. While a sentence within statutory limits is ordinarily not a cruel and unusual punishment (People v. Jones, 39 N.Y.2d 694, 697), "in some rare case[s]" the statute can be unconstitutionally applied (People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, 119, cert denied 423 U.S. 950). Although defendant received the minimum sentence permitted by the statute, we find that the statute was unconstitutionally applied and we reduce the sentence accordingly, to 2 to 4 years, to avoid cruel and unusual punishment in the circumstances (People v. Skeffery, 188 A.D.2d 438).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Rosenberger and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1993
191 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WANDA MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 39

Citing Cases

In re Igartua

In other words, it was cruel and usual punishment for the respondents to apply 4 1/2 to 9 years imprisonment…

People v. Thompson

olem v Helm, 463 U.S. 277; Robinson v California, 370 U.S. 660; Weems v United States, 217 U.S. 349; People v…