From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marengo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 9, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered May 12, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of five counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to five consecutive terms of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Mary C. Farrington, for respondent.

Jonathan Svetkey, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues concerning the identifications made by the numerous witnesses were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations. The extensive identification testimony was corroborated by physical evidence.

The motion court properly denied defendant's application to controvert the search warrant as untimely (see, CPL 255.20). The court correctly found that defendant had sufficient information upon which to make such a motion from the inception of the case, and that defendant did not establish good cause for the delay. The record also supports the court's alternative finding that the motion was without merit.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Marengo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Marengo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL MARENGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 860

Citing Cases

People v. Mitchell

The defendant can waive this right through mere inaction ( People v. Davidson , 98 NY2d 738, 739 [2002] ["The…

People v. Marte

We agree that trial courts have discretion to hear and decide such motions pursuant to CPL 255.20. However,…