From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mar

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District
Feb 1, 2000
77 Cal.App.4th 1284 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

finding belt acted as a "psychological restraint" that impeded defendant's testimony

Summary of this case from Hawkins v. Comparet-Cassani

Opinion

F028945

Filed February 1, 2000 Modified Opinion, February 22, 2000 REVIEW GRANTED

Reprinted without change in the Review Granted Opinions Pamphlet to permit tracking pending review and disposition by the Supreme Court.




Summaries of

State v. Mar

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District
Feb 1, 2000
77 Cal.App.4th 1284 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)

finding belt acted as a "psychological restraint" that impeded defendant's testimony

Summary of this case from Hawkins v. Comparet-Cassani
Case details for

State v. Mar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES ALLEN MAR, Defendant and…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 1, 2000

Citations

77 Cal.App.4th 1284 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 771

Citing Cases

People v. Mar

Appeal from Superior Court of Kern County, No. 68695, Clarence Westra, Jr., Judge, Ct.App. 5 F028945. Review…

Hawkins v. Comparet-Cassani

However, the district court's findings of prejudice do not support its conclusion that serious questions…