From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Macedonio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued June 3, 1977

Decided June 30, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE F.X. McINERNEY, J.

Gerald J. Callahan, John F. Middlemiss, Jr., and Leon J. Kesner for appellant.

Henry F. O'Brien, District Attorney (Kevin J. Crowley of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Once the lawyer entered the criminal proceeding representing the defendant in connection with criminal charges under investigation, it was impermissible to question defendant in custody and in the absence of his attorney (People v Ramos, 40 N.Y.2d 610, 614; People v Hobson, 39 N.Y.2d 479, 481). Proof that defendant had type "A" blood and that the semen found within the victim was emitted from a male with blood of that type should not have been admitted, in view of the large proportion of the general population having blood of said type (People v Robinson, 27 N.Y.2d 864).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Macedonio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Macedonio

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL MACEDONIO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1977

Citations

42 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 1977)
397 N.Y.S.2d 1002
366 N.E.2d 1355

Citing Cases

People v. White

Accepting the results of the tests for purposes of determining innocence does not involve the same alchemy…

People v. Sturdivant

In People v Robinson, 27 N.Y.2d 864; 317 N.Y.S.2d 19; 265 N.E.2d 543 (1970), it was held that proof that the…