From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lyons

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 22, 2016
879 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 153125. COA No. 319252.

06-22-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Maurice LYONS, Defendant–Appellant.


Order On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion to supplement the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand for resentencing is GRANTED, in part, and we REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. The motion for peremptory reversal, the motions to remand, and the motion for reissuance of the judgment are DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Lyons

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 22, 2016
879 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Lyons

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Maurice…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

879 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. 2016)
499 Mich. 958

Citing Cases

Lyons-Bey v. Campbell

The Michigan Supreme Court denied petitioner leave to appeal because it was "not persuaded that the question…