From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lydon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1993
197 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 18, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A joint trial with two juries was properly conducted in this case (see, CPL 200.40 [b], [c]; People v. Riccardo B., 73 N.Y.2d 228). The defendant and his accomplice (see, People v Toal, 197 A.D.2d 650 [decided herewith]) were tried and convicted based upon much of the same evidence, and each had made a confession implicating the other, so that the use of two juries was appropriate (see, People v. Riccardo B., supra).

The defendant's contention that the County Court should have charged the defense of extreme emotional disturbance is meritless (see, e.g., People v. White, 164 A.D.2d 413, affd 79 N.Y.2d 900), as are all of the defendant's remaining contentions. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lydon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1993
197 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Lydon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS M. LYDON, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 771

Citing Cases

People v. Toal

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The evidence establishes that the defendant and an accomplice (see,…

Lydon v. Kuhlman

The Appellate Division affirmed the convictions on October 18, 1993. It held that a joint trial with two…