From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ludwig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1941
262 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

June 30, 1941.

Appeal from Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. The question of the illegality of the order revoking the defendant's permit may not be reviewed in a prosecution for failure to comply with an administrative order. ( City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., 122 App. Div. 748; City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., 124 id. 641.) The proper forum to test that question is provided for in section 666, subdivision 6, of the New York City Charter, effective January 1, 1938. (See Matter of Towers Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N.Y. 94.)


Summaries of

People v. Ludwig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1941
262 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

People v. Ludwig

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD LUDWIG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

People v. Namro Holding Corp.

The clarity of the notice of violation is specious if, to determine its validity, one must pursue a tortuous…

People v. Gillman

The propriety of an administrative order issued by the city's commissioner of housing and buildings may not…