From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lucas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1997
238 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 21, 1997


Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.), rendered May 22, 1995, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The court did not err in refusing to charge criminally negligent homicide as a lesser included offense of manslaughter in the second degree. A lesser included offense is properly charged when it is impossible to commit the greater offense without, by the same conduct, committing the lesser included offense, and a reasonable view of the evidence supports a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see, People v. Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 944; People v Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427, 430). While criminally negligent homicide can be a lesser included offense of manslaughter in the second degree (see, People v. Heide, supra; People v. Edwards, 235 A.D.2d 348; People v. Barclift, 140 A.D.2d 615), in this case there is no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, that the defendant failed to perceive the risk of causing death when he fired several shots in close proximity to the victim (see, People v. Randolph, 81 N.Y.2d 868; People v. Wall, 29 N.Y.2d 863; People v. Stephens, 198 A.D.2d 245, affd 84 N.Y.2d 990; People v. Jenkins, 176 A.D.2d 348; People v DeGraw, 140 A.D.2d 984; People v. Barclift, supra; People v Williams, 192 A.D.2d 737).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lucas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1997
238 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD LUCAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 662

Citing Cases

People v. White

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against…

People v. Hegdal [2d Dept 1999

Other bystanders and drivers were also hit and suffered serious injuries. Contrary to the defendant's…