From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Liebenthal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 8, 1959
155 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1958

Decided January 8, 1959

Appeal from the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, in the First Judicial Department, JAMES R. CREEL, M., A. LAWRENCE ACQUAVELLA, M.

M. Arthur Hammer for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Charles W. Manning and Peter J. O'Connor of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FROESSEL and BURKE. Judges FULD and VAN VOORHIS dissent and vote to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that there was no evidence to establish solicitation upon the part of defendant as required by the statute.


Summaries of

People v. Liebenthal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 8, 1959
155 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

People v. Liebenthal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK LIEBENTHAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 8, 1959

Citations

155 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1959)
155 N.E.2d 871
182 N.Y.S.2d 26

Citing Cases

People v. Lopez

Frank D. O'Connor, District Attorney ( Morton Greenspan of counsel), for respondent. Judgment affirmed (see…

People v. Hale

While clause (c) does apply to loitering pimps and prostitutes, it applies equally to loitering homosexuals.…