From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lebron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1983
95 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

June 27, 1983


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), rendered September 23, 1980, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Although the trial court's charge to the jury as to the issue of alibi was erroneous (see People v. Bauer, 83 A.D.2d 869; People v. Carreras, 83 A.D.2d 590; People v. Fludd, 68 A.D.2d 409), the error was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law and it was, in any event, harmless in view of the overwhelming proof of guilt (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Two instances of Trowbridge error (see People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471) were likewise not preserved for our review as a matter of law and, in any event, in view of the strength of the identification testimony, the error must be deemed harmless since there was no substantial issue on the point (see People v. Mobley, 56 N.Y.2d 584, 586). We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Bracken and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lebron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1983
95 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Lebron

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILFREDO LEBRON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1983

Citations

95 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Walker

In our view, the jury, hearing the whole charge, "would have gathered from its language the correct rule to…

People v. Samalot

Judgment affirmed. A review of the record discloses that the issues raised on this appeal were not litigated…