From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Johnson v. Lacy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1997
243 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.).


In 1985, petitioner was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 1/2 to 13 years. He was paroled in 1993; however, in 1994 he was convicted of the crime of robbery in the third degree, receiving a sentence of six months in jail and five years' probation. Following his release, petitioner was again involved in the criminal justice system, pleading guilty on April 5, 1996 to a class A misdemeanor for which he received a one-year sentence of imprisonment. Thereafter, his 1994 probationary sentence was revoked and petitioner was resentenced to a 4 2/3 to 14-year term of imprisonment. He then commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his resentencing on the ground that the 1994 sentence of probation was illegal. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. Habeas corpus relief is unavailable where, as here, petitioner's claim has been or may be raised on his direct appeal or in a postjudgment motion pursuant to CPL article 440 ( see, People ex rel. Sims v. Senkowski, 226 A.D.2d 800, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 807).

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Johnson v. Lacy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1997
243 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People ex rel. Johnson v. Lacy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ROBERT JOHNSON, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 946

Citing Cases

People v. N.Y. State Bd.

In support of his application, petitioner asserts that the revocation of his parole was improper because he…

People v. Donelli

Petitioner's challenge to the resentencing could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440…