From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kint

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 28, 2007
742 N.W.2d 610 (Mich. 2007)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that "a statement offered to show why police officers acted as they did is not hearsay"

Summary of this case from People v. Hanson
See 12 Summaries

Opinion

No. 134707 (32) (33).

December 28, 2007.

SC: 134707, COA: 275874, Jackson CC: 03-001724-FH

The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to strike is DENIED.

Summaries of

People v. Kint

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 28, 2007
742 N.W.2d 610 (Mich. 2007)

holding that "a statement offered to show why police officers acted as they did is not hearsay"

Summary of this case from People v. Hanson

Concluding that "a statement offered to show why police officers acted as they did is not hearsay"

Summary of this case from People v. Fountain

outlining the elements of armed robbery

Summary of this case from People v. Gigliotti

stating that the use of hearsay testimony to prove something other than the truth of the matter is not unconstitutional

Summary of this case from People v. Patten

stating that for felonious assault, the defendant needs to have committed an assault with a dangerous weapon

Summary of this case from People v. Timmer

defining the elements of felonious assault

Summary of this case from People v. Battle

stating that a statement offered to show why a police officer took certain action is not hearsay

Summary of this case from People v. Thomas

stating the elements of assault with a dangerous weapon

Summary of this case from People v. Moore

listing the elements of felonious assault as " an assault, with a dangerous weapon, and with the intent to injure or place the victim in reasonable apprehension of an immediate battery"

Summary of this case from People v. Campbell

defining the elements of felonious assault

Summary of this case from People v. Tilton

observing that "a statement offered to show why police officers acted as they did is not hearsay"

Summary of this case from People v. Lyons

explaining that a statement offered to show why police acted in the way they did is not hearsay

Summary of this case from People v. Lewis
Case details for

People v. Kint

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD JEFFREY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 28, 2007

Citations

742 N.W.2d 610 (Mich. 2007)

Citing Cases

People v. Fields

"The Confrontation Clause prohibits the admission of all out-of-court testimonial statements unless the…

King v. Curtin

Michigan state law defines armed robbery as: (1) the defendant was engaged in the course of committing a…

312 Citing Cases