From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 8, 1999

Leighton M Jackson, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie, Leonard Joblove, and Valerie A. DePalma of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated March 29, 1999 (People v. King, 259 A.D.2d 763 [2d Dept., Mar. 29, 1999]) affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 9, 1997.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.

DECISION ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant for reargument of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 9, 1997, which was determined by decision and order of this court dated March 29, 1999.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. THOMAS KING, appellant. (Ind. No. 10/96)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 526

Citing Cases

King v. Greiner

On November 8, 1999, the Appellate Division denied petitioner's motion for a writ of error coram nobis.…