From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kinard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 2, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Kennedy, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and new trial granted. Memorandum: Under the facts of this case, defendant is not precluded from raising the issue of the discriminatory exercise of peremptory challenges by the prosecution for the first time on appeal. The issue had been raised at trial by a codefendant and the record indicates that four potential veniremen who are black were peremptorily excused by the prosecutor, leaving an all-white jury to decide the fate of defendant, who is black. Thus, a prima facie case of racial discrimination was set forth under Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). Because 10 years have passed since this conviction and the Trial Judge has died, we conclude that a reconstruction hearing is impossible. Therefore, defendant is entitled to a new trial (see, People v. Harris, 151 A.D.2d 961).


Summaries of

People v. Kinard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Kinard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CURTIS KINARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 413

Citing Cases

Reyes v. Greiner

Where a petitioner alleges only that the trial judge tripped up in some way in navigating the procedural…