From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kalteux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 11, 2003
2 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

12839.

Decided and Entered: December 11, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Rosen, J.), rendered March 15, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the first degree.

Eugene P. Devine, Public Defender, Albany (Theresa M. Suozzi of counsel), for appellant.

Paul A. Clyne, District Attorney, Albany (Bradley A. Sherman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Defendant entered this plea in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment arising out of a violent domestic dispute in the City of Watervliet, Albany County, during which he repeatedly punched, kicked and stabbed his wife. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, defendant was to be sentenced to 2… to 5 years in prison, but he failed to appear for sentencing. Following a two-year hiatus, defendant was sentenced to 7… to 15 years in prison, and he now appeals.

First, defendant complains that his plea of guilty was not voluntary since he lacked a complete understanding of his legal rights or the consequences of the plea. Defendant's failure to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction leaves this issue unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Thomas, 307 A.D.2d 592, 592;People v. De Berardinis, 304 A.D.2d 914, 915; People v. Barnes, 302 A.D.2d 623, 623, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 652; People v. Nieves, 302 A.D.2d 625, 625, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 541). In any event, the record reveals the complete lack of any factual basis which would support this argument.

Next, we find no merit to defendant's present claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because he was not properly apprised of his legal rights or potential defenses to the indictment. Again, we find no record evidence to support such a claim. Defendant's attorney made significant and detailed pretrial motions, competently participated in all pretrial hearings, and successfully obtained an advantageous plea agreement for defendant. Additionally, defendant affirmatively acknowledged to County Court that he was satisfied with the services rendered by his attorney. The totality of the circumstances clearly reveals that defendant received the meaningful assistance of counsel within constitutional requirements (see People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 708). Finally, mere assertions that counsel did not explore all possible defenses does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v. Smith, 302 A.D.2d 677, 680, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 543).

As a final matter, defendant's attack on the sentence imposed is precluded by his voluntary waiver of appeal (see People v. Stauber, 307 A.D.2d 544, 545; People v. Schryver, 306 A.D.2d 626, 626-627, [2003]; People v. Ackerly, 297 A.D.2d 861, 862, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 554).

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Kalteux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 11, 2003
2 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Kalteux

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM P. KALTEUX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 390

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

Defendant now appeals. Defendant's challenges to the validity of his plea and to the effectiveness of…

People v. Jackson

Furthermore, we are not persuaded by defendant's contention that defense counsel's failure to make a motion…