From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Joseph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 6, 2013
103 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-6

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Aasim JOSEPH, appellant.

Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for respondent.



Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Toomey, J.), rendered January 17, 2012, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim with respect to the voluntariness of the plea survives even a valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Cohen, 100 A.D.3d 919, 953 N.Y.S.2d 900;People v. McLean, 77 A.D.3d 684, 684, 908 N.Y.S.2d 352). However, the transcript of the plea proceeding demonstrates that prior to the defendant's plea, the County Court ensured that the defendant understood the specific period of postrelease supervision which would follow his term of incarceration under the terms of the plea agreement ( compare People v. Boyd, 12 N.Y.3d 390, 393, 880 N.Y.S.2d 908, 908 N.E.2d 898;People v. Hill, 9 N.Y.3d 189, 192, 849 N.Y.S.2d 13, 879 N.E.2d 152,cert. denied 553 U.S. 1048, 128 S.Ct. 2430, 171 L.Ed.2d 257;People v. Louree, 8 N.Y.3d 541, 545, 838 N.Y.S.2d 18, 869 N.E.2d 18;People v. Catu, 4 N.Y.3d 242, 244, 792 N.Y.S.2d 887, 825 N.E.2d 1081). Accordingly, contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered ( see generally People v. Figueroa, 100 A.D.3d 1016, 954 N.Y.S.2d 467).


Summaries of

People v. Joseph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 6, 2013
103 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Aasim JOSEPH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
103 A.D.3d 665
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 765

Citing Cases

People v. Solis

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Although the defendant validly waived his right to appeal, his claim…

People v. Rogers

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent because the County…