From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 30, 2013
495 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2013)

Summary

adopting the dissenting opinion in Fuhr v Trinity Health Corp, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 16, 2013 (Docket No. 309877), which in turn adopted Scott's rule for disregarding testimony that is so "blatantly contradicted by the record" that "no reasonable jury could believe it" when deciding whether there was a genuine issue of material fact in a motion for summary disposition

Summary of this case from Henderson v. City of Detroit

Opinion

Docket No. 146953. COA No. 313270.

2013-09-30

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Larry Darnell JONES, Defendant–Appellant.


Prior report: 494 Mich. 884, 834 N.W.2d 477.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 30, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 30, 2013
495 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2013)

adopting the dissenting opinion in Fuhr v Trinity Health Corp, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 16, 2013 (Docket No. 309877), which in turn adopted Scott's rule for disregarding testimony that is so "blatantly contradicted by the record" that "no reasonable jury could believe it" when deciding whether there was a genuine issue of material fact in a motion for summary disposition

Summary of this case from Henderson v. City of Detroit

adopting the dissenting opinion in Fuhr v Trinity Health Corp, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 16, 2013 (Docket No. 309877), which in turn adopted Scott's rule for disregarding testimony that is so "blatantly contradicted by the record" that "no reasonable jury could believe it" when deciding whether there was a genuine issue of material fact in a motion for summary disposition

Summary of this case from Talley v. Macomb Intermediate Sch. Dist.

In Fuhr, the plaintiff did not claim he was terminated because he contacted the United States Attorney until he was deposed and the evidence indicated that the decision to terminate the plaintiff was made before the plaintiff did so.

Summary of this case from Jones v. McLaren Med. Mgmt.

In Fuhr, our Supreme Court overruled this Court's unpublished decision and remanded for entry of summary disposition in favor of the defendants "for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion."

Summary of this case from Mickens v. Meemic Ins. Co.
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Larry Darnell…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

495 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2013)
843 N.W.2d 123

Citing Cases

Mickens v. Meemic Ins. Co.

It instead involves one witness telling a story that is patently contradicted by video evidence. See Fuhr v…

Yousif v. Robert M. Birach, Robert M. Birach, P.C.

His conduct revealed unequivocal knowledge of his illegal status and lack of proper documentation. See Fuhr v…