From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 89 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490).

The court properly exercised its discretion when it admitted photographs of the crime scene taken from the officer's observation post and with a lens that had the same magnification as the binoculars used by the officer during his observations since they were admitted to demonstrate to the jury the power of the binoculars and how close they made objects appear (see, People v. Rao, 107 A.D.2d 720). The photographs were properly authenticated by the observing officer as well as the photographer, and the jury was clearly made aware that the photographs were taken in daylight whereas the incident occurred at night.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 89 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 89 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 143

Citing Cases

People v. Whiten

Although, as the jury was made aware, these photographs were taken from a slightly different position from…

People v. Rodriguez

Were we to review these claims, we would find that the evidence was properly admitted as background…