From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.).


Defendant, by pleading guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, forfeited any claim pursuant to CPL 30.30 (see, People v O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009). To the extent that defendant argues that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated we conclude, after consideration of the factors set forth in People v Taranovich ( 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445), that the delay of less then one year between the date of the crime and the motion to dismiss did not violate defendant's constitutional right in this regard.

Yesawich Jr., J.P., Levine, Crew III, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH E. JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Pratt

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree stemming from his inappropriate…

People v. Carrillo

Moreover, there is nothing in the record to support any inference that defendant suffered any prejudice. We…