From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1982
434 N.E.2d 261 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued January 12, 1982

Decided February 11, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, EUGENE W. BERGIN, J.

Donald O. Chesworth, Jr., District Attorney ( Kenneth R. Fisher of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. O'Neill and Edward J. Nowak for respondent.


Order reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Justice JOHN J. CALLAHAN at the Appellate Division ( 79 A.D.2d 203, 204) and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]), this court having determined that the reversal by the Appellate Division was "upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal" with respect to the issues reviewed (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and MEYER.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1982
434 N.E.2d 261 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DIANE JEAN JOHNSON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1982

Citations

434 N.E.2d 261 (N.Y. 1982)
434 N.E.2d 261
449 N.Y.S.2d 192

Citing Cases

People v. Hayes

The defendant's principal contention is that he invoked the right to counsel at the start of a videotaped…

People v. Thompson

Such invocation, however, must be clear and unambiguous; a defendant must state unequivocally that he wants…