From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 1990
157 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 11, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence (People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305).

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms" (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Carro, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 1990
157 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK JOHNSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
549 N.Y.S.2d 692

Citing Cases

Topliff v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP

However, to the extent that Defendant is merely arguing that the jogging suit's compliance with federal…

McCarthy v. Olin Corp.

The general rule is, of course, that the legality of an act does not insulate it from possible tort…