From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 20, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.).


Defendant does not challenge the fact that he attacked the victim with a broken glass bottle and cut his face with said bottle. Instead, defendant maintains that there was insufficient proof to demonstrate that the victim sustained physical injury within the meaning of the Penal Law (see, Penal Law § 10.00). However, in light of, among other things, the two, two-inch lacerations of the victim's face, which caused him to bleed profusely and which necessitated twenty-two stitches, the trial court reasonably determined that the evidence was sufficient to establish defendant's guilt (see, e.g., Jackson v Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319).

Under the circumstances, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence, since this was defendant's third conviction for assaultive behavior.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. John

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN JOHN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

TOMPKINS v. JACKSON

formance of which is not to be completed before the end of a lifetime. It is clear that defendant's alleged…