From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 24, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.).


The court properly denied defendant's requests to proceed pro se at trial. Defendant's requests were equivocal since they were overshadowed by his numerous requests for new counsel, his frequent complaints about his present counsel, and his repeated applications for adjournments ( see, People v. Payton, 45 N.Y.2d 300, 314, revd on other grounds 445 U.S. 573). Moreover, defendant specifically conditioned his request for self representation on the court's granting of a totally unwarranted adjournment, and defendant did not abandon the latter demand until after trial had commenced. In addition, defendant engaged in seriously disruptive behavior ( see, People v. McIntyre, 36 N.Y.2d 10, 17), which was documented by the court on the record.

The court properly rejected defendant's claim that his first attorney failed to advise him of his right to testify before the Grand Jury.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL JIMENEZ, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

People v. Morris

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to his contention on appeal, the defendant did not make a…

People v. Lewis

Here, it was only after the court made it perfectly clear that new counsel would not be appointed that…