From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 28, 2009
483 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2009)

Summary

In People v Jackson, 483 Mich 884; 759 NW2d 401 (2009), the Supreme Court, in granting leave, instructed the parties to address "whether imposing a 20 percent late fee pursuant to MCL 600.4803(1) constitutes an impermissible collection effort or sanction for non-payment or provides a means of enforcement that exposes a defendant to more severe collection practices than the ordinary civil debtor.

Summary of this case from People v. Jahncke

Opinion

No. 135888.

January 28, 2009.

Court of Appeals No. 282579.


Leave to Appeal Granted:

The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether People v Dunbar, 264 Mich App 240 (2004), was correctly decided; (2) whether trial courts are required to consider a defendant's ability to repay attorney fees as articulated in Dunbar before ordering the defendant to commence reimbursement of attorney fees pursuant to MCL 769.1k; (3) whether Dunbar correctly held that a challenge to an order for repayment of attorney fees may be premature until collection efforts have begun; (4) what standards should govern a trial court's determination whether a defendant should be responsible for the repayment of attorney fees and when repayment should begin, including what consideration, if any, should be given to a defendant's other financial obligations (such as restitution or child support), or a defendant's incarceration; and (5) whether imposing a 20 percent late fee pursuant to MCL 600.4803(1) constitutes an impermissible collection effort or sanction for nonpayment or provides a means of enforcement that exposes a defendant to more severe collection practices than the ordinary civil debtor. See Dunbar, supra at 253.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the April 2009 session calendar for argument and submission. Appellant's brief and appendix must be filed no later than March 2, 2009, and appellee's brief and appendix, if appellee chooses to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than March 27, 2009.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than April 2, 2009. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than April 2, 2009.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 28, 2009
483 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2009)

In People v Jackson, 483 Mich 884; 759 NW2d 401 (2009), the Supreme Court, in granting leave, instructed the parties to address "whether imposing a 20 percent late fee pursuant to MCL 600.4803(1) constitutes an impermissible collection effort or sanction for non-payment or provides a means of enforcement that exposes a defendant to more severe collection practices than the ordinary civil debtor.

Summary of this case from People v. Jahncke
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARVEY EUGENE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 28, 2009

Citations

483 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2009)

Citing Cases

People v. Wallace

We disagree. On January 28, 2009, our Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in People v. Jackson, 483 Mich.…

People v. Jahncke

He also asserts the penalty is usurious. In People v Jackson, 483 Mich 884; 759 NW2d 401 (2009), the Supreme…