From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 10, 1994
202 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Chin Brandt, J.).


Since this case involved "unlawful entry", and not "unlawful remaining", the court erred by denying defendant's request to eliminate the phrase "or remains" from its instructions on burglary (People v. Gaines, 74 N.Y.2d 358). However, the error was harmless, because there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant entered without criminal intent (see, People v Davila, 181 A.D.2d 582, 583).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 10, 1994
202 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONNIE JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

People v. Ray

Defendant's contention that the court should have omitted from its charge on burglary any reference to…

People v. Mestres

However, since the defense counsel never objected to the charge, this contention is unpreserved for appellate…